Applicability of provision – Whether Respondent No. 2 had power to hold that, modification of PPA without its approval was valid on grounds that, some of wind generators had accepted it and that whether directions given by Respondent No. 2 under Impugned order would also be applicable to wind generators who had not signed PPA with Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (Respondent No. 2/MSEDCL) prior to Impugned order?
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Tarini Infrastructure Ltd. and Ors. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5875 OF 2012 AND 1973-1974 OF 2014 DECIDED ON: 05.07.2016
BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY, NEW DELHI (APPELLATE JURISDICTION)
Indian Wind Power Association, Mumbai v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Mumbai and Anr. APPEAL NO. 210 OF 2014 DECIDED ON: 26.02.2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and Ors. v. Nectar Life Sciences Limited and Anr. CWP NO. 2741 OF 2009 DECIDED ON: 10.05.2016
Notification – Central Government specifies single phase electric storage water heaters up to 200 liters, for household and similar purposes and intended for heating water below boiling temperature, their rated voltage being not more than 250 V – Notification No. : SO2901(E) dated 07.09.2016
The Need of a Legal Definition of the term ‘Sustainable Energy’ for a Sustainable Future
BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY, NEW DELHI (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) Spectrum Power Generation Limited, Hyderabad v. Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Hyderabad and Ors. APPEAL NO. 257 OF 2014 DECIDED ON: 18.03.2016
. view complete profile
Refer friends and get 5 reward points
for every bestie who registers.
Enter their email ids. Like [email protected] or [email protected],[email protected],[email protected]